I would imagine 'r' represents either the ID of the room it was broadcast from, or the ID of the room it was broadcast to.

In this case, following the use of '-1' elsewhere in SFS, I would guess that -1 is the same as 'null', as the message is not from/to any room in particular.

Thanks Lapo, I think I was getting closer to the problem but this has nailed it on the head.

I hadn't realised the activeRoomID was a property that could be set as well as read. Is there any preference for setting the activeRoomID rather than just specifying the targeted roomID for each message sent?

The documentation for the 'onPrivateMessage' method states that four parameters are received as:

message:String, sender:User, roomId:Number, userId:Number

However, after bashing my head and digging around in the code for a while, I found the actualy implementation of this method:

scope ...

I've no idea if this would work, but what about creating a simple batch file in the SF server directory that starts SmartFox. Then you could call that batch file from your ant task. This may well run into the same relative paths/permissions problems, but it might be worth a try.

I would advise the exact opposite of what ptd suggests.

The compiler is more than happy to recognise (x==1 || x==2) as two seperate conditionals, and the added parenthesis just make it harder to spot exactly what is being evaluated. I would only really include the nested parenthesis when you have ...

As no-one seems to be able to offer any kind of solution to this, and as it seems to go against the expected behaviour, I am now entering this as a bug.

http://forums.smartfoxserver.com/viewtopic.php?t=3409

Thanks.

SFS 1.6.2
AS2 API 1.5.4

- Join a static room
- Join a game room while still remaining in the original static room
- All users leave game room and it is deleted
- Expecetd behaviour is that the user should now simply be in the first, static room. However, at this point, the user seems to still be ...

Anyone?

Ok, this is becoming a bit of a show-stopper, and I can't see where I could be going wrong with this, so if someone can please offer any help it would be much appreciated.

A more basic reproduction, but still the same problem:

-User is in the lobby (RoomX).
-User joins a game room (RoomY).
-User ...

I've no idea about future support for Unity, but if there is no native solution then you could still most likely create a Flash proxy client to sit between SmartFox and your Unity application.

I've just finished doing exactly this for a Shockwave application and it works very well. All data from ...

Flash AS2 API - Version 1.5.4
SF Server - Version 1.6.2

I am using the multi-join feature to allow users to remain in the lobby while also entering another game room.

I can successfully add a user to both rooms, and everything works as expected until a user leaves the game room (but remains in the ...

As per the smartfox docs/examples, my app is set up to listen for an onRoomListUpdate event, when logging in, meaning I have a reference to the current roomList when entering the lobby.

However, after implementing the 'Secure Login Example' in the docs, the onRoomListUpdate is never triggered ...

Why is it that smartfox sends/receives all its system messages in XML rather than JSON? As mentioned in your docs, when using server-side extensions it is preferable to use JSON over XML because it uses less bandwidth. Surely the same applies for the internal messaging of smartfox ?

Awesome, thanks a lot Lapo!

Any closer to having these available?

Thanks.