I keep wanting to use a shared object and am tempted to use Rooms as sharedobjects. It appears to me that Room acts like a sharedobject (red5/fms) or a holder of a shared object (by using RoomVariables) but has more overhead/functionality. Is there any chance that in a future version, we could have a shared object (setting dynamic data that is synchronized between client and server) without the overhead of Room. And then Room would just inherit sharedobject?
Sharedobjects would have clients that 'join'/subscribe to them either via the client or server side code.
Not sure if this is the best forum to put this and I realize that you know the internals and design of the system better than I do.
- Board index SmartFoxServer Pro/Basic 1.x Features Wish List
- Search
-
- It is currently 11 Feb 2026, 15:04
- All times are UTC
Shared Object / Room Lite
Post here your suggestions for new possible features in SmartFoxServer.
Return to “Features Wish List”
Jump to
- SmartFoxServer 2X
- ↳ SFS2X Questions
- ↳ SFS2X Client API
- ↳ SFS2X ActionScript 3 API
- ↳ SFS2X C# API
- ↳ SFS2X iPhone / iPad / OSX API
- ↳ SFS2X Java / Android API
- ↳ SFS2X HTML5 / JavaScript API
- ↳ SFS2X C++ API
- ↳ RedBox 2X
- ↳ 2X Features Wish List
- SmartFoxServer Pro/Basic 1.x
- ↳ SmartFoxServer 1.x Discussions and Help
- ↳ Server Side Extension Development
- ↳ BlueBox
- ↳ RedBox
- ↳ Features Wish List
- ↳ The Bug Trap
- ↳ Client API - SFS 1.x
- ↳ .Net / Unity3D API
- ↳ iPhone Objective-C API
- ↳ Silverlight API
- ↳ Java2SE / Android Client API
- ↳ Other Client API
- OpenSpace Support
- ↳ OpenSpace v2 discussions and help
- ↳ OpenSpace v1 discussions and help
- SmartFoxBits Support
- ↳ SmartFoxBits for SFS 2X
- ↳ SmartFoxBits for SFS 1.x
- Community
- ↳ Job offers and requests
- ↳ The Gallery