Lapo wrote:
Shutting down the system for a whole class of users is dangerous and can lead to problems.
Isn't that what is done already for the admin type user?
Isn't it better to handle a "No timeout" for a group like NPC, than to have to force generated traffic to prevent a User from falling off when you know, in most cases, it is a user that should be "on" all the time.
Since the original timeouts, you've added "Force Logins" and "Socket Timeouts" to assist with stuck sessions as well.
Am I mistaken in thinking that <MaxSocketIdleTime> could be used to handle a lot of lost connections instead of IdleTime?
- Mike